CoRL 2026 Workshop

How Real Is Real Enough?

Physical Fidelity in Real2Sim for Robot Learning

Morning half-day, 8:30–12:30 Nov. 9, 2026 Austin, Texas

About

Robot learning increasingly gets its training and evaluation environments through real2sim: scenes and objects reconstructed from real images or video, very often in-the-wild human video, into assets a robot can act in. The whole approach rests on one assumption: that a world rebuilt from real observation is faithful enough for a policy trained or tested in it to still work on the real robot.

In the in-the-wild setting where this would help the most, we lack a general, transfer-predictive way to tell whether that assumption holds. The strongest reconstruction models may return geometry and appearance that look right, while still lacking metric scale, separated manipulable parts, collision geometry, articulation, mass, friction, and contact behavior.

This workshop brings together researchers from 3D and 4D reconstruction, physics-based simulation, and robot policy learning around one concrete question: when a world is reconstructed from a real image or video and cannot be checked against ground-truth physics, what makes it trustworthy enough for a robot to act in, and can we predict real-world policy transfer before we deploy?

The workshop is a working session rather than a sequence of talks. Its output will be a community position paper, a first draft of a transfer-oriented fidelity protocol, and a public benchmark and leaderboard seeded by the live demo challenge.

Core Questions

The workshop is organized around four research questions from the final proposal.

Q1. What is the reference, and the benchmark?

When a world comes from a real image or human video, a ground-truth mesh and reliable pose are both missing. Which signal can stand in for ground truth: observable surface and contact behavior, the original human demonstration, or minimal held-out or interventional robot signals?

Q2. From visual reconstruction to actionable assets

What must a reconstruction expose before a robot can use it: scale, separated manipulable parts, collision geometry, articulation, mass, friction, and other physical parameters?

Q3. Agentic and closed-loop real2sim, and who certifies the loop?

An agentic or closed-loop system could choose what to reconstruct, estimate physical parameters, judge when a world is good enough, and direct robot interaction. What held-out, robot-collected, or interventional signal can certify such a world?

Q4. Real enough for which policy, and which task?

Fidelity is never absolute. Can we define a task-conditioned notion of fidelity that predicts whether a given policy will transfer, and tells us where reconstruction and simulation effort pays off?

Invited Speakers

The workshop features four committed invited speakers spanning reconstruction, simulation, and robot learning.

Ming C. Lin

Ming C. Lin

University of Maryland

Committed
Jiajun Wu

Jiajun Wu

Stanford University

Committed
Daniel Seita

Daniel Seita

University of Southern California

Committed
Ying Jiang

Ying Jiang

NVIDIA Spatial Intelligence Lab

Committed

Interactivity

The workshop is a working session: talks set up what each field can and cannot measure, while three interactive blocks turn the room's discussion into a shared fidelity rubric.

Comic illustration for live demo challenge

Live Demo Challenge

Live Demo Challenge

Four finalists run generated or reconstructed worlds through shared challenge infrastructure. Each demo shows the asset, recovered physical parameters, and a fixed robot task in simulation, paired with prerecorded real-robot footage so the room can judge whether simulated behavior predicts transfer.

Comic illustration for rotating roundtables

Rotating Roundtables

Rotating Roundtables

Attendees split across four tables, each owning one research question. Invited speakers rotate between tables so every group works through its question with each speaker. Organizers record arguments, proposed metrics, failure cases, and open disagreements into a shared document for the panel.

Comic illustration for panel discussion

Panel Discussion

Panel Discussion

The invited speakers and organizers take the shared roundtable document on stage and turn it into concrete open problems, a first transfer-oriented fidelity rubric, and next steps for the post-workshop position paper, public benchmark, and leaderboard seeded by the live challenge.

Schedule

Morning half-day workshop. All times are tentative and will follow the final CoRL workshop schedule.

Time Session Topic / Notes
08:30 – 08:40 Opening Remarks Welcome and workshop overview
08:40 – 08:50 Spotlight Talk I Selected contributed paper
08:50 – 09:00 Spotlight Talk II Selected contributed paper
09:00 – 09:20 Live Demo Challenge Four finalists; simulation runs shown beside prerecorded real-robot transfer
09:20 – 09:40 Invited Talk I 18 min talk + 2 min Q&A
09:40 – 10:00 Invited Talk II 18 min talk + 2 min Q&A
10:00 – 10:20 Poster Session and Coffee Break Posters
10:20 – 10:40 Invited Talk III 18 min talk + 2 min Q&A
10:40 – 11:00 Invited Talk IV 18 min talk + 2 min Q&A
11:00 – 11:40 Rotating Roundtables Four Q1–Q4 tables; invited speakers rotate between rounds
11:40 – 11:50 Break
11:50 – 12:20 Panel Discussion Open problems and first draft of the fidelity rubric
12:20 – 12:30 Closing Remarks and Best-Paper Awards Artifact next steps and awards

Call for Papers

We invite short, non-archival papers of up to four pages excluding references. Submissions will be managed through OpenReview and reviewed double-blind in a single round without rebuttal. Papers already accepted at the CoRL 2026 main conference are not eligible. The two best accepted papers will be presented as spotlight talks, and the rest will appear as posters.

The paper track runs alongside the live demo challenge, a separate track in which teams submit agentic-generation or real2sim models rather than papers.

Topics of Interest

  • Real2Sim and digital twins for robot learning, especially from in-the-wild images and video
  • Reconstruction for manipulation without ground-truth pose or a CAD model
  • Physical parameter identification for deformable, fluid, granular, and articulated objects
  • Agentic and closed-loop real2sim, and ways to certify an agent-built world
  • Fidelity metrics that predict real-world policy transfer
  • Datasets pairing reconstructed worlds with real-robot transfer outcomes

Important Dates

Submission Deadline TBD
Notification TBD
Workshop Date Nov. 9, 2026
Location JW Marriott Austin

Organizers

Peihao Li

Peihao Li

UC Berkeley

Yumeng He

Yumeng He

UCLA

Jiachen Li

Jiachen Li

Georgia Tech

Dinesh Manocha

Dinesh Manocha

University of Maryland

Yin Yang

Yin Yang

University of Utah